<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How About a Good Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robinsblog.com/06032005/chrome-text-with-fireworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robinsblog.com/06032005/chrome-text-with-fireworks/</link>
	<description>Resources for Web Development Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.robinsblog.com/06032005/chrome-text-with-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinsblog.com/?p=126#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David.  I removed the link, I should have investigated the site more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David.  I removed the link, I should have investigated the site more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hucklesby</title>
		<link>http://www.robinsblog.com/06032005/chrome-text-with-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hucklesby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinsblog.com/?p=126#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I just took a look at the Complete CSS Tutorial. I wouldn&#039;t recommend it. It may represent practices five years ago, but it is far from today&#039;s best practices.

The terminology is incorrect, too. To begin, &quot;selector&quot; is sometimes confused with &quot;rule&quot;. And some terms are decidedly archaic. I mean, &quot;layers&quot;? That comes from Netscape 4 -  a concept Netscape itself abandoned years ago.

The article on &quot;divitis&quot; is useful. Sadly, the world&#039;s favorite browser does not understand many of the advanced selectors shown in the article.  :-(

I checked the &quot;Famous Logos&quot; fonts at Dafont. Enron&#039;s &quot;crooked E&quot; is missing!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just took a look at the Complete CSS Tutorial. I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it. It may represent practices five years ago, but it is far from today&#8217;s best practices.</p>
<p>The terminology is incorrect, too. To begin, &#8220;selector&#8221; is sometimes confused with &#8220;rule&#8221;. And some terms are decidedly archaic. I mean, &#8220;layers&#8221;? That comes from Netscape 4 &#8211;  a concept Netscape itself abandoned years ago.</p>
<p>The article on &#8220;divitis&#8221; is useful. Sadly, the world&#8217;s favorite browser does not understand many of the advanced selectors shown in the article.  <img src='http://www.robinsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I checked the &#8220;Famous Logos&#8221; fonts at Dafont. Enron&#8217;s &#8220;crooked E&#8221; is missing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

