<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS and Design Links Galore!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robinsblog.com/03092005/css-and-design-links-galore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robinsblog.com/03092005/css-and-design-links-galore/</link>
	<description>Resources for Web Development Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hucklesby</title>
		<link>http://www.robinsblog.com/03092005/css-and-design-links-galore/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hucklesby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinsblog.com/?p=9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Wonderful list, yes. But why do so many designers insist on using miniscule text sizes? My eyesight is pretty good, but on my 15 inch LCD screen at 1400 x 1050 pixels, I have to zoom in a goodly amount to read many of them - and then the page falls apart!

The &quot;designers&quot; list has the most offenders. Why?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful list, yes. But why do so many designers insist on using miniscule text sizes? My eyesight is pretty good, but on my 15 inch LCD screen at 1400 x 1050 pixels, I have to zoom in a goodly amount to read many of them &#8211; and then the page falls apart!</p>
<p>The &#8220;designers&#8221; list has the most offenders. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
